In a meeting where engagement is low, what guideline is being followed by choosing not to interrupt?

Choosing not to interrupt during a meeting where engagement is low illustrates an understanding of nonverbal signals. This guideline emphasizes the importance of creating a comfortable atmosphere for participants. By avoiding interruptions, a facilitator can observe participants' body language and facial expressions, which may provide valuable insights about their level of engagement and comfort.

When individuals feel heard and are given the chance to express their thoughts without interruption, it may encourage them to contribute more actively to the discussion. Nonverbal cues can indicate a person's willingness to participate or their need for support, which can help the facilitator adjust the dynamics of the meeting accordingly. In this way, being attentive to nonverbal signals not only enhances communication but also fosters a more inclusive environment, which is critical when engagement is low.